Loaded false positive study data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\HL\3.98\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequences_20.mat
max_rotation=0 r=0 n=1 a=GGAC FASTA(n).Sequence=GGAC
pJAR3DFalsePositiveStudy Timestamp 18-Jul-2025 23:24:54
Evaluating how sequences fit models
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.54, deficit  2.33, CutoffScore  43.92, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.39, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  87.51, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.24, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.57, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.42, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score     -10.13, deficit  2.92, CutoffScore  37.67, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.42, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  89.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.44, deficit  1.24, CutoffScore  86.98, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  89.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.15, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.28, deficit  3.08, CutoffScore  67.54, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.60, deficit  0.59, CutoffScore  62.23, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUGU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.47, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  76.08, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.12, deficit -1.09, CutoffScore  48.31, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.42, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.19, deficit  1.99, CutoffScore  79.10, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.82, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  59.89, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GCGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.16, deficit  2.38, CutoffScore  43.40, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
UCUA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.18, deficit -0.03, CutoffScore  68.74, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UCGA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.17, deficit  2.39, CutoffScore  43.31, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AAAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.28, deficit  2.08, CutoffScore  78.07, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.28, deficit  3.08, CutoffScore  67.54, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -5.63, deficit -1.04, CutoffScore  47.79, ed  2, 2 cWW-F                                   
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GCGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.16, deficit  2.38, CutoffScore  43.40, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.82, CutoffScore  70.35, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.38, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  87.56, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGUGA 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -5.28, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  51.48, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.82, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
ACUGU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -5.41, deficit  1.74, CutoffScore  50.09, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUUUA 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.41, deficit  0.40, CutoffScore  95.80, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.09, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  34.22, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  92.32, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUGGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.30, deficit  2.36, CutoffScore  75.13, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CCAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.89, deficit  0.75, CutoffScore  60.49, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGUCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.15, deficit  0.31, CutoffScore  65.17, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUGCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.60, deficit  1.39, CutoffScore  85.36, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GAAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -5.11, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  98.75, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCACC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.81, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  35.41, ed  3, 2 cWW-F                                   
UGUAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.99, deficit  1.89, CutoffScore  80.07, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
AUAAU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.54, deficit  3.34, CutoffScore  64.84, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGUC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.32, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  97.91, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.82, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
AGAAU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.98, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.58, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, CutoffScore  96.13, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.82, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
UAAUG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -7.71, deficit  3.70, CutoffScore  61.05, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.30, deficit  2.36, CutoffScore  75.13, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  92.32, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_60914.1,  3 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.35, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUUAG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_46501.1,  5 NTs,                CUGAAG,score      -4.32, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-cWS                                 
AGAUU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.54, deficit  0.33, CutoffScore  65.00, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UAAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -7.13, deficit  2.14, CutoffScore  77.43, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCUUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.13, deficit  3.93, CutoffScore  58.66, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.89, deficit  0.75, CutoffScore  60.49, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUAG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_46501.1,  5 NTs,                CUGAAG,score      -4.32, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-cWS                                 
GGAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  92.32, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUGCC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.55, deficit  1.34, CutoffScore  85.86, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GUAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.12, deficit -0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAGAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.31, deficit  0.77, CutoffScore  91.90, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AAUCU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.24, deficit  4.04, CutoffScore  57.52, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUAG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_46501.1,  5 NTs,                CUGAAG,score      -4.32, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-cWS                                 
CUUCG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.33, deficit  1.32, CutoffScore  86.11, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUCAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.44, deficit  3.24, CutoffScore  65.87, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -4.95, deficit  0.42, CutoffScore  95.61, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.30, deficit  3.10, CutoffScore  67.33, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCGAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_22135.1,  4 NTs,                 UCCAA,score      -4.40, deficit  1.20, CutoffScore  55.84, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAUGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -5.76, deficit -0.17, CutoffScore  70.22, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCGUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.50, deficit  4.30, CutoffScore  54.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGAAU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.98, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.58, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.80, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  98.65, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GCUAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -7.38, deficit  2.26, CutoffScore  76.20, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUGUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.19, deficit  0.06, CutoffScore  99.32, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUUGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -5.11, deficit  1.44, CutoffScore  84.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CACUUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.15, deficit  0.21, CutoffScore  66.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AUCUCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.35, deficit  0.67, CutoffScore  61.36, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGAAAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.19, deficit  0.10, CutoffScore  98.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCGUUG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_65313.1,  5 NTs,                CCUUUG,score      -5.49, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAACG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_22584.6,  5 NTs,               GAAACAC,score     -10.69, deficit  8.29, CutoffScore  26.52, ed  0, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
CUUGGG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -7.72, deficit -0.51, CutoffScore  73.80, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAACG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_22584.6,  5 NTs,               GAAACAC,score     -10.69, deficit  8.29, CutoffScore  26.52, ed  0, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
GGUAAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -4.28, deficit  2.52, CutoffScore  73.77, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUUGAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.48, deficit  1.00, CutoffScore  57.87, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAAAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.80, deficit  4.04, CutoffScore  57.90, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUGAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.16, deficit  0.69, CutoffScore  61.16, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUCGUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -5.67, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  67.71, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUCUGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.23, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  36.84, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GAAUUC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_29966.1,  5 NTs,                AAAUUU,score      -4.50, deficit  0.08, CutoffScore  99.12, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAAUG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -5.83, deficit -0.31, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUAGCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.87, deficit  1.77, CutoffScore  81.36, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGGUCG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -7.02, deficit  1.89, CutoffScore  48.48, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GAGGAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_20811.4,  5 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score      -6.75, deficit -0.77, CutoffScore  49.88, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-F                               
CAGAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -6.20, deficit  1.31, CutoffScore  54.58, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-cSH                               
CAAUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_49922.4,  5 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.59, deficit  0.53, CutoffScore  62.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUGUAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_49922.4,  5 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.66, deficit  0.60, CutoffScore  62.08, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUUCG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -5.48, deficit  1.75, CutoffScore  82.37, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGAGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.13, deficit  6.37, CutoffScore  33.64, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.80, deficit  4.04, CutoffScore  57.90, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AUUCAU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_71391.1,  5 NTs,                GGGAAC,score      -5.82, deficit  2.02, CutoffScore  78.77, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUUUGU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -8.18, deficit  6.24, CutoffScore  37.44, ed  1, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
GGAAUC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.28, deficit  0.15, CutoffScore  98.47, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAGCGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.77, deficit  0.67, CutoffScore  61.34, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGAAAA 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -3.30, deficit  1.54, CutoffScore  83.96, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUCAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_86870.2,  5 NTs,                GUGUUC,score      -8.04, deficit  2.74, CutoffScore  39.61, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCCGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -6.88, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  63.04, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGGCCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.49, deficit  0.39, CutoffScore  64.32, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGAAGA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.44, deficit  4.68, CutoffScore  51.17, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAAAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.19, deficit  0.10, CutoffScore  98.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGCCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -6.76, deficit  4.82, CutoffScore  51.74, ed  0, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
UGUCUA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_78347.4,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score      -9.87, deficit  1.81, CutoffScore  80.91, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGUGGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -7.85, deficit  3.31, CutoffScore  65.15, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCUUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.13, deficit  2.95, CutoffScore  68.98, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAAUC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.28, deficit  0.15, CutoffScore  98.47, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUUGUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -7.53, deficit  2.41, CutoffScore  43.10, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGAACG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_22584.6,  5 NTs,               GAAACAC,score     -10.69, deficit  8.29, CutoffScore  26.52, ed  0, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
CGUCAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.44, deficit  0.34, CutoffScore  64.88, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UCUUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -9.17, deficit  2.49, CutoffScore  42.19, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCAUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.90, deficit  0.77, CutoffScore  60.36, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGGUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_49922.4,  5 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.53, deficit  0.47, CutoffScore  63.51, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCGUAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_49922.4,  5 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.58, deficit  0.52, CutoffScore  62.93, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUCCAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_22584.6,  5 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -7.82, deficit  5.42, CutoffScore  51.99, ed  2, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
GAUUUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -6.76, deficit  1.88, CutoffScore  80.24, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-cSH                               
GGAGGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.24, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  59.93, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAAAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.80, deficit  4.04, CutoffScore  57.90, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUCGCGA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -11.60, deficit  7.17, CutoffScore  35.64, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UAACAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_59735.5,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -8.05, deficit  2.71, CutoffScore  39.92, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAUGAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.87, deficit  2.93, CutoffScore  37.55, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUGGCAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -8.09, deficit  3.62, CutoffScore  30.32, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGUGCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -8.21, deficit  3.57, CutoffScore  22.16, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGGGCAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -13.54, deficit  5.52, CutoffScore  21.81, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
CCGUCAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score      -9.00, deficit  0.92, CutoffScore  38.64, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
AGCACAU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -9.31, deficit  7.55, CutoffScore  21.32, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UAUCAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.98, deficit  1.31, CutoffScore  23.05, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSW-F                               
CGGGACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -7.19, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  29.27, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGUUGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.41, deficit  1.77, CutoffScore  60.60, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
UUGAGGA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -8.22, deficit  3.58, CutoffScore  22.09, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUAUGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -6.99, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  38.64, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
UUACUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -8.93, deficit  2.14, CutoffScore  14.27, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GUCAUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -8.01, deficit  1.22, CutoffScore  24.03, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUAAGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -7.00, deficit  0.76, CutoffScore  61.31, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AGAAAGU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.17, deficit  5.41, CutoffScore  43.56, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGUCAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.76, deficit  1.09, CutoffScore  25.34, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSW-F                               
CUAAGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.53, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.88, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AACCGAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.07, deficit  0.61, CutoffScore  30.45, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUGAGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -9.81, deficit  1.42, CutoffScore  21.94, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GCCAAUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -6.45, deficit  0.86, CutoffScore  59.42, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCAAUAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -8.44, deficit  3.97, CutoffScore  58.23, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AGAACUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -7.92, deficit  1.47, CutoffScore  61.03, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUAUUUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -8.73, deficit  0.90, CutoffScore  30.18, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGUUCUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_78347.4,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score      -8.47, deficit  0.41, CutoffScore  64.12, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUCAAGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -9.13, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  29.11, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUGACGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -8.47, deficit  2.03, CutoffScore  30.01, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AUCGUCU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -9.77, deficit  3.10, CutoffScore  35.80, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGCCGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.58, deficit  1.11, CutoffScore  25.13, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUAAGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -8.90, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  33.68, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AGUUUGU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -6.61, deficit  1.09, CutoffScore  56.97, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UUUUAUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_25967.2,  7 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -6.66, deficit  2.22, CutoffScore  82.02, ed  2, 0 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
CAGGCGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -7.94, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  24.40, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UCAGACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -9.29, deficit  4.30, CutoffScore  11.14, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUUCAGC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -9.43, deficit  1.20, CutoffScore  55.78, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGAGCAA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_59843.1,  6 NTs,               UCAAUGA,score      -7.54, deficit  1.79, CutoffScore  49.56, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGGCUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78347.4,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score      -9.62, deficit  1.57, CutoffScore  20.37, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGUUGUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.92, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  56.42, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
CGAGAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -8.12, deficit  2.45, CutoffScore  42.63, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
GGGCGGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -6.85, deficit  3.51, CutoffScore  50.84, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
CAAAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.42, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.82, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGACAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -7.21, deficit  1.54, CutoffScore  52.17, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
CUCCCGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.54, deficit  2.07, CutoffScore  78.23, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAAGAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.77, deficit  1.32, CutoffScore  54.50, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAGAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.16, deficit  6.40, CutoffScore  33.26, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAUGUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -7.05, deficit -0.51, CutoffScore  42.22, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F                               
GGUGAAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.77, deficit -0.63, CutoffScore  43.43, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGAUGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -7.71, deficit  0.15, CutoffScore  35.28, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-F                               
GAUGACUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -8.02, deficit  1.77, CutoffScore  50.87, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAAAUUAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.19, deficit  1.49, CutoffScore  40.77, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
CGAAUAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -9.02, deficit  3.40, CutoffScore  52.84, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CGAAGACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_47854.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.69, deficit  2.78, CutoffScore  53.25, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UAACGGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -17.22, deficit  9.87, CutoffScore   3.06, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
GGCGGAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -12.81, deficit  4.08, CutoffScore  22.95, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AGUUACUU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score     -10.75, deficit  4.73, CutoffScore  37.88, ed  3, 1 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
GACCCGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -9.81, deficit  3.34, CutoffScore   1.66, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
ACGUUUUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score     -10.03, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  16.97, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGUGGUUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score      -8.11, deficit  0.64, CutoffScore  42.33, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGUAAAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -5.97, deficit  0.18, CutoffScore  70.28, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
UUGAGUUA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score      -8.86, deficit  4.10, CutoffScore  43.25, ed  3, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
UGUCAGGA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_09452.1,  5 NTs,             UAGGGGCUA,score     -11.97, deficit  3.26, CutoffScore  20.21, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAUUAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -7.43, deficit  1.41, CutoffScore  40.44, ed  2, 2 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
AUCAUGGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -9.94, deficit  5.51, CutoffScore  27.20, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGACACGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_89567.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -6.62, deficit  2.71, CutoffScore  54.54, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCGAAAAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_77082.1,  8 NTs,              CCGAAAAG,score      -7.44, deficit -0.07, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGCAAUGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -7.94, deficit  0.55, CutoffScore  94.18, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUUGAUAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score     -10.25, deficit  4.96, CutoffScore  43.21, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAGUUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.90, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  35.15, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
GAGGAAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score      -9.55, deficit  4.92, CutoffScore  50.70, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
CUUCGACG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -9.04, deficit  0.64, CutoffScore  61.64, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UCUGUCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score     -12.36, deficit  4.28, CutoffScore   8.84, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAGAUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score      -9.08, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  33.89, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
ACCCCCUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -12.97, deficit  7.40, CutoffScore   8.04, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
UGAUUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score     -10.37, deficit  3.89, CutoffScore   6.77, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GAAAAAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -5.87, deficit  1.07, CutoffScore  40.88, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUGAAUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score      -7.61, deficit  2.85, CutoffScore  53.23, ed  2, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CUGAUUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_85367.2,  8 NTs,             CUGGGGCGG,score     -10.89, deficit  6.15, CutoffScore  14.72, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAAAAGCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.09, deficit  2.70, CutoffScore  40.02, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUCUAUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_86012.1,  8 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score     -11.37, deficit  8.27, CutoffScore  24.41, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
UAAUCACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -11.03, deficit  4.53, CutoffScore  48.40, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUGAAAAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -6.73, deficit  0.15, CutoffScore  98.40, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAUGACUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -8.02, deficit  1.77, CutoffScore  50.87, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GCAAAAUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -8.80, deficit  1.79, CutoffScore  49.56, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGACCAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.21, deficit  1.74, CutoffScore  81.71, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UACCAAGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.16, deficit  2.77, CutoffScore   7.69, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUACAACC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -9.84, deficit  1.44, CutoffScore  53.22, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAUCUCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.78, deficit  0.76, CutoffScore  65.47, ed  1, 1 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
GAUUGCUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score     -10.52, deficit  5.19, CutoffScore  17.28, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F                         
GCUUUGAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -7.81, deficit  1.32, CutoffScore  59.25, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GACCAAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.93, deficit  2.54, CutoffScore  10.12, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GACAACUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -8.21, deficit  1.20, CutoffScore  24.17, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UCACGCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -9.03, deficit  4.60, CutoffScore  13.99, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUCGUUCA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -9.28, deficit  3.23, CutoffScore  34.42, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CACAAGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.17, deficit  1.79, CutoffScore  18.05, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GCAAUUAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -7.09, deficit  0.39, CutoffScore  73.19, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
AAGUGUCU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -11.65, deficit  4.52, CutoffScore  32.84, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
CCGUGCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -8.79, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  21.72, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GAAACUAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.88, deficit  3.38, CutoffScore  15.20, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGCGAACGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.31, deficit  6.02, CutoffScore   9.60, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UGAAAAAGA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -9.39, deficit  4.02, CutoffScore  33.18, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CCGGAUCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_33983.1,  7 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score      -8.76, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  41.03, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUAACAAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93383.1,  9 NTs,             GCCCUAAGC,score      -8.89, deficit  5.42, CutoffScore  19.57, ed  3, 3 cWW-cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUCAUUGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -11.28, deficit  5.71, CutoffScore  34.37, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
GUCUUGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_15802.1,  7 NTs,             ACUCUGGAU,score     -11.84, deficit  5.63, CutoffScore   8.51, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
UGGUGAAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -15.19, deficit  6.87, CutoffScore  34.00, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAAAUCCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.78, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  43.27, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUAGGAAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score      -9.80, deficit  5.17, CutoffScore  49.14, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
GGAACUCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -9.27, deficit  3.91, CutoffScore  13.92, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
UAUUUGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -9.66, deficit  0.92, CutoffScore  24.10, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAAGAACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.80, deficit  2.29, CutoffScore  43.18, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUCAACCUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80599.2,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score      -9.39, deficit  4.09, CutoffScore  26.72, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGCACAUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32735.2,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score     -11.24, deficit  7.61, CutoffScore  37.18, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CCCGUUUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.63, deficit  3.55, CutoffScore  23.85, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
AGAGAAUAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18565.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -11.07, deficit  5.90, CutoffScore   9.89, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GUAAAGGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score     -11.78, deficit  5.35, CutoffScore  11.48, ed  2, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
UCAGGUCAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.57, deficit  3.48, CutoffScore  42.43, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CUCUCAUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -9.34, deficit  0.42, CutoffScore  27.00, ed  4, 3 cWW-cWW                                 
CUUCCUUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -9.51, deficit  0.59, CutoffScore  48.95, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW                                 
GUUUGGAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score      -8.70, deficit  0.44, CutoffScore  46.83, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
GACGAUCGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.44, deficit  3.07, CutoffScore  19.48, ed  4, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CUAUGAUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -13.48, deficit  6.14, CutoffScore  25.87, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
GCGUAUAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -13.95, deficit  5.64, CutoffScore  22.18, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUGAAAGCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score      -8.77, deficit  3.34, CutoffScore  74.42, ed  2, 0 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
CUGUUCUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -8.52, deficit  3.19, CutoffScore  63.93, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F                         
CAGGCGAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score      -7.66, deficit  2.64, CutoffScore  50.72, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
AACAUCGUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.80, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  15.77, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAUUUGUAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -10.65, deficit  3.31, CutoffScore  43.16, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
CAAGUAUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -10.21, deficit  2.87, CutoffScore   9.20, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
CAUUUUCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score      -9.67, deficit  2.29, CutoffScore  46.15, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUCGAAACC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score      -8.93, deficit  3.50, CutoffScore  27.22, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
GGUCGGUCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_86012.1,  8 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -5.72, deficit  2.62, CutoffScore  54.33, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GGAGUCAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.88, deficit  3.38, CutoffScore  15.20, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UCCAAGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.81, deficit  5.52, CutoffScore  30.67, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AAGAGUUAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -10.07, deficit  2.93, CutoffScore  42.95, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
CAAAAAACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -7.78, deficit  1.34, CutoffScore  62.20, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUUCGAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score      -8.43, deficit  0.17, CutoffScore  73.80, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
CGUAACCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -9.40, deficit  3.62, CutoffScore  38.24, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
AAAAAAGUU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -13.16, deficit  5.25, CutoffScore  20.43, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
CUACCAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_80008.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -8.69, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  39.28, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
GGAGUGAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -14.16, deficit  6.01, CutoffScore  20.20, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUCAGACAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score      -8.50, deficit  3.87, CutoffScore  57.23, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
UGAAUGAAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -14.24, deficit  4.90, CutoffScore  40.86, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCAUAAGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_18565.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -10.18, deficit  5.01, CutoffScore  15.29, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GUUUUGAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_10453.3,  7 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.13, deficit  2.54, CutoffScore  22.84, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAAAUCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score      -8.60, deficit  1.75, CutoffScore  40.08, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UUUUCAAAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_80008.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -7.68, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  69.03, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CUCUGCGACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -11.43, deficit  5.86, CutoffScore  16.68, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
CUCGGAAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_29129.3,  8 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -11.36, deficit  4.48, CutoffScore  20.73, ed  4, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CGUCGUUAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -13.55, deficit  6.56, CutoffScore  13.59, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUGAUAACAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score     -11.73, deficit  5.55, CutoffScore  22.51, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
CUAGAUAAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.70, deficit  3.61, CutoffScore   5.24, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
UAAUCAGAAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_58224.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -10.07, deficit  3.38, CutoffScore  29.24, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AUUUCAUUGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -15.08, deficit  4.47, CutoffScore  15.52, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
AUAAAAAAGU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.25, deficit  4.43, CutoffScore  34.04, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CUGACUCCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -12.53, deficit  7.19, CutoffScore   2.55, ed  4, 4 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UCCUGGCUUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93135.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -14.21, deficit  5.68, CutoffScore  10.85, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UCAAGUCAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -14.24, deficit  5.66, CutoffScore  17.85, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUCCCGCUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -9.82, deficit  4.25, CutoffScore  42.52, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
CGAGGAAGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score      -9.97, deficit  4.95, CutoffScore  20.49, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
GGCUGCGAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -17.84, deficit  9.77, CutoffScore   4.35, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCUUAUUCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -11.21, deficit  3.83, CutoffScore  16.65, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGGGUGAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16991.1,  8 NTs,          UGUGGAGGAGUA,score     -13.16, deficit  6.68, CutoffScore   4.26, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F                     
AAAUCCCAAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_85434.1, 10 NTs,            GGUAUCCCAC,score     -13.49, deficit  7.90, CutoffScore  10.61, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUGAAACUCA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score      -7.08, deficit  1.74, CutoffScore  75.95, ed  3, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UGAGCUAAAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -10.41, deficit  2.34, CutoffScore  13.03, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAGCUAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.70, deficit  3.61, CutoffScore   5.25, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
GAUAGCAGGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -10.56, deficit  2.49, CutoffScore  30.32, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUGGUCUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.46, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore  24.91, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
GGUAAAAUAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -11.27, deficit  1.52, CutoffScore  26.37, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGGUAGCUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score      -9.69, deficit  4.35, CutoffScore  32.21, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAUUCCACAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score      -7.98, deficit  2.91, CutoffScore  49.44, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUGGAAGAUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.50, deficit  4.68, CutoffScore  32.48, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GUCAGCAUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -13.18, deficit  8.90, CutoffScore  16.89, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
UAAUUAAGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.87, deficit  4.59, CutoffScore  18.24, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGUCCUUGUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -11.89, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  34.43, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAUCUAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score     -10.18, deficit  5.11, CutoffScore  19.94, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUUGUUUAUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_87463.1,  9 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -7.88, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  54.25, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUGGAAGACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score      -9.66, deficit  4.32, CutoffScore  32.38, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUCUUUUCAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score     -15.54, deficit  9.36, CutoffScore   2.21, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
UUCAUCAAUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -10.31, deficit  4.74, CutoffScore  22.98, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
AGCGAUGGGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.79, deficit  3.71, CutoffScore   4.66, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
GAGAUGCAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -12.48, deficit  3.89, CutoffScore  30.29, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AUCGAUCGUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_89881.5, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.47, deficit  9.65, CutoffScore   6.76, ed  5, 3 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UAAUACUAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score     -13.15, deficit  6.70, CutoffScore   2.05, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUAAAAAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -10.32, deficit  0.98, CutoffScore  25.30, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGUCAACUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -13.48, deficit  8.14, CutoffScore  28.22, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGGCUCUUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -12.25, deficit  4.51, CutoffScore  11.56, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CACGGCGACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score      -9.95, deficit  3.50, CutoffScore  40.74, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGUGCAUUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -11.31, deficit  1.56, CutoffScore  26.02, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAGAACAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.34, deficit  5.52, CutoffScore   8.19, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CCCGAUGGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -13.23, deficit  5.16, CutoffScore  14.11, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUAACCGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85434.1, 10 NTs,            GGUAUCCCAC,score     -13.05, deficit  7.46, CutoffScore  12.95, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCGUAGAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore  24.55, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AUUGGAACAUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_87463.1,  9 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score     -11.58, deficit  5.97, CutoffScore  33.79, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUUUUCGAUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.11, deficit  2.50, CutoffScore  27.91, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGUUAAGAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -10.99, deficit  3.18, CutoffScore  28.86, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUCACGUGUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -14.25, deficit  7.13, CutoffScore   2.24, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGCCUUUAACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -15.42, deficit  7.61, CutoffScore   2.98, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GACCUAAACUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -12.29, deficit  5.24, CutoffScore  17.69, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
CCUUGAUUAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -10.80, deficit  2.98, CutoffScore  30.00, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUAUGGUGGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -12.24, deficit  1.99, CutoffScore  14.51, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
CGUAGGCUGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93135.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -10.73, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  32.01, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GACAAAUGUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20781.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.24, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore   8.89, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AGUUCGUCUGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -13.09, deficit  5.97, CutoffScore  38.85, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGCGCCAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -10.43, deficit  3.38, CutoffScore  11.09, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
GCAUUUCGGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70751.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -11.22, deficit  4.47, CutoffScore   8.90, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UUUCGGCCAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93135.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -12.83, deficit  4.30, CutoffScore  19.25, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUUCAAUUCGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -13.47, deficit  5.39, CutoffScore  12.07, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGUCGAAGACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -15.11, deficit  4.49, CutoffScore  15.39, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUAGAAAGCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score     -10.02, deficit  1.07, CutoffScore  37.29, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UAAACGUCGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -14.85, deficit  7.73, CutoffScore  14.50, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGACGCGAACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -17.96, deficit 10.18, CutoffScore   4.11, ed  4, 3 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
CCCAACAAUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -14.84, deficit  5.84, CutoffScore   1.52, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AAAAAAAAAUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20781.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.26, deficit  3.39, CutoffScore   8.73, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AGCAGUAAAAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -10.01, deficit  2.96, CutoffScore  48.21, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
GGAAAAUAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20781.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.24, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore   8.89, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUUAGAAUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -11.05, deficit  0.43, CutoffScore  40.85, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGGGGACGGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41902.1, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -11.01, deficit  4.38, CutoffScore  33.08, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F                   
GAAAACGAGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70751.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -15.53, deficit  8.79, CutoffScore   1.61, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGAAAGCAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -11.51, deficit  2.51, CutoffScore  36.47, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUAAACCUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_89881.5, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score      -9.54, deficit  4.72, CutoffScore  46.42, ed  2, 2 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUUCAGACGGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -12.65, deficit  4.57, CutoffScore  31.39, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUGCAAUGCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -13.27, deficit  7.93, CutoffScore  29.25, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAGGAAUUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -13.85, deficit  4.56, CutoffScore  18.02, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
AGCACAAAAAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -13.44, deficit  5.18, CutoffScore  10.89, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
UGAAUUGCCAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -12.29, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  14.22, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
CGCAAAGCGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -11.82, deficit  3.56, CutoffScore   2.21, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
AUGCCUGAGAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_09260.2,  6 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -12.86, deficit  2.62, CutoffScore  48.33, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UCCGAAAAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -15.00, deficit  7.96, CutoffScore   2.01, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
CUUUGAAACCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_55305.1,  5 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -14.07, deficit  4.66, CutoffScore  23.10, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAAAUAAAGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -13.96, deficit  6.05, CutoffScore  14.77, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
CGAUGAACGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -16.62, deficit  7.33, CutoffScore   1.25, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
CUACUUUGACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -13.05, deficit  4.31, CutoffScore  21.13, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUCCUACGUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -14.27, deficit  8.70, CutoffScore   0.75, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
ACAUGGAAAAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -14.46, deficit  6.65, CutoffScore   8.57, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUAAAACAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20781.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.24, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore   8.89, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUAAGUUACACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_74379.3,  9 NTs,          GCAAGGUUAACC,score     -13.09, deficit  3.65, CutoffScore  36.55, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F                   
CUUGGAAAUCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_19210.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -12.01, deficit  7.20, CutoffScore  10.44, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUAAAAAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -13.97, deficit  7.31, CutoffScore   3.29, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
GACUCGAAUGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -18.44, deficit 10.36, CutoffScore   2.12, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGCAAGGAUGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -14.89, deficit  4.15, CutoffScore  26.29, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GAGAAGUAAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -15.52, deficit  7.44, CutoffScore   1.71, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUCGUAAAUUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -15.74, deficit  5.12, CutoffScore  11.43, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUCGUUCGAAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.17, deficit  3.56, CutoffScore  21.24, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGAGCGUGGAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -11.94, deficit  1.69, CutoffScore  53.01, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
CUAUGACAACCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_55305.1,  5 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -14.08, deficit  4.67, CutoffScore  23.03, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AGAAUUUAACUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81312.1, 10 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -14.48, deficit  8.19, CutoffScore   7.38, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UUAUUGAUUCAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_81312.1, 10 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -11.25, deficit  4.96, CutoffScore  24.80, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGUAAAGAAGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16991.1,  8 NTs,          UGUGGAGGAGUA,score     -15.42, deficit  8.94, CutoffScore   8.03, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F                     
GUGGAAUUAUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -17.23, deficit  6.61, CutoffScore   2.09, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAACAAGAAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -14.44, deficit  6.36, CutoffScore  37.48, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UGUUUAAGAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -14.23, deficit  6.45, CutoffScore  22.73, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
CGUACAAGGACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -16.85, deficit  6.08, CutoffScore  21.15, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUAGAUAUCACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -12.22, deficit  4.15, CutoffScore  16.73, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CUUCUAACAGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.73, deficit  4.12, CutoffScore  17.72, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAAAUCGAAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88558.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.51, deficit  4.85, CutoffScore   4.78, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGUCGCAAUUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.63, deficit  3.02, CutoffScore   5.83, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGAGCAAUUAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.48, deficit  2.37, CutoffScore  14.00, ed  5, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGCGUUGCCGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -15.83, deficit  5.58, CutoffScore  10.91, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
GGCUCUUAUGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -14.52, deficit  3.75, CutoffScore   1.97, ed  7, 5 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UUACAAAGAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.94, deficit  6.87, CutoffScore   2.68, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
GAAGCAGCUUUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -13.36, deficit  4.03, CutoffScore  31.69, ed  5, 3 cWW-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F                 
CGAUCGCGAUAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -16.94, deficit  9.16, CutoffScore  24.18, ed  3, 2 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
AGGCGAAAAAAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -14.28, deficit  3.88, CutoffScore   2.30, ed  7, 5 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
UAAGAUAUGUCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -18.78, deficit  8.01, CutoffScore  11.08, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGUUGGAAGAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16991.1,  8 NTs,          UGUGGAGGAGUA,score     -15.64, deficit  9.17, CutoffScore   6.88, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F                     
GGCACAAAAUUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -17.45, deficit  7.05, CutoffScore   1.39, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
AGAAGUCGCGUGAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_68572.1,  9 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -14.89, deficit  0.76, CutoffScore   5.52, ed  7, 5 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UUAGUUCUGCAAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68572.1,  9 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -15.32, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  20.96, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAACGAAAAAGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -16.37, deficit  4.21, CutoffScore   5.00, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGGAUGAGCUUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68572.1,  9 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -17.04, deficit  2.91, CutoffScore  10.65, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUUCGGAGCGAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_84847.1, 14 NTs,        GUUCGCAACCAUCC,score     -16.08, deficit  7.94, CutoffScore   0.44, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-tWW-F-F-F-F-F-F             
CAGAUCGCUUAUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_74055.2, 13 NTs,       CUGAAAGCAUCUAAG,score     -15.42, deficit  9.28, CutoffScore   2.72, ed  4, 4 cWW-tWH-cWH-tSH-tHW-tHW-tSW             
GUUAGCAAAGAGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98870.1, 11 NTs,     CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG,score     -16.80, deficit  7.50, CutoffScore   3.30, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-tWW-F-F-F-F-F                   
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc[10 10]	 94.0000	  4.0000	  0.0000
[11 11]	 86.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[12 12]	 44.0000	  2.0000	  0.0000
[13 13]	 18.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[14 14]	 10.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[15 15]	  4.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[16 16]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[17 17]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[18 18]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[19 19]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[20 20]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[21 21]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[22 22]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[23 23]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[24 24]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[25 25]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[26 26]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[27 27]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[4 4]	100.0000	 72.0000	 66.0000
[40 40]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[41 41]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[5 5]	100.0000	 96.0000	 72.0000
[6 6]	100.0000	 88.0000	 52.0000
[7 7]	 98.0000	 38.0000	 12.0000
[8 8]	 98.0000	 34.0000	  8.0000
[9 9]	 98.0000	 16.0000	  2.0000
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc




Model HL_10456.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cWW-tWW-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCAGGGGAGGAAUCGG
Model HL_12758.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-cHW-F-F-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-F-tSH-F-cHW-F-cWH-cWH, sequence CGAAGGUGAGGAGAGGCGAGGAAGAG
Model HL_13971.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-tSW-F-tSH-tSH-cWW-F-F, sequence UUCCCGUCCGAUCA
Model HL_14757.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSW-tWW-cWW-tHW-tSW-F-cWH-F, sequence CCUGACUUCUAUACUAAG
Model HL_21400.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tSW-cWW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH, sequence AGGUGGGUGGUGUGGAGGAGUAU
Model HL_35354.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cHW-F-cWH-cHW-F-F-tHH-cWH-tWW-cWH-F-tWW-cWH-F-cWH, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_51921.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tSS-tHS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAAUUGCAGAUAUUCGUGAA
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWS-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_60293.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWH-F-cWH-cHW-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-F-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_66482.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWW-F-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAUCCGAGUUGCAAGAG
Model HL_73916.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUAGCUCAGUCGGUAGAGCAGGGGAUUGAAAAUUCCGAGU
Model HL_97756.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cSH-cWS-F-tSW-cSW-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence UACCCAUCCCGAACA
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_33074.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.31%,  22 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_64292.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCCCAUUCGGGUCU
Model HL_73247.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.63%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUACACGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_81205.3  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_85461.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAGCCAUUUAUGGCGAAC
Model HL_89346.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAAGGGGGCAACUCCAUCU
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_99324.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_02581.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.32%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-tSW-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_07903.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_74055.2  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-cWH-tSH-tHW-tHW-tSW, sequence CUGAAAGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_88364.2  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.72%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_91641.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_63355.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_84847.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-tWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGCAACCAUCC
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.19%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_50851.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAGGCGGUUGGU
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.17%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_29958.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_73183.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_20751.2  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_31581.6  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.55%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cHS-F-F-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_04725.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS, sequence GUUACUUAGUUC
Model HL_41902.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_11542.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCGGCCAAAG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.67%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_23509.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.35%,   1 instances, signature cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAUUCAUUUUC
Model HL_93616.2  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.52%,   8 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_15118.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_68572.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_68767.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_07583.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_55305.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_89881.5  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_07480.2  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_80411.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_81312.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.51%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_16398.2  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_45785.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence GUUCCCUCACC
Model HL_74379.3  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGUUAACC
Model HL_24792.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F, sequence GCCCGUUAUC
Model HL_23115.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_09260.2  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_16991.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAGGAGUA
Model HL_70751.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_93383.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCCCUAAGC
Model HL_01255.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCAGUAAAG
Model HL_70658.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_47732.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_05304.3  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_88558.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_04171.7  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.78%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_25847.2  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F, sequence GUAACUAUAAC
Model HL_32735.2  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_94376.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_74292.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.13%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_85434.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAUCCCAC
Model HL_19210.3  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_23010.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_78284.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGAGAUGAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_93135.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_28252.8  matched a sequence  79 times, TP  97.86%, TN  96.02%, 140 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCAAGUC
Model HL_41543.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGCAGCCCGUC
Model HL_68257.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAACGCUUGCGUUU
Model HL_50418.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAGGCAC
Model HL_36684.4  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUUUUAAUC
Model HL_67407.5  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACCGUCUGG
Model HL_42998.2  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAAC
Model HL_49941.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGUGGUUAG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_38649.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_20781.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_97983.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_50779.4  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAACGC
Model HL_29129.3  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_40252.4  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_34964.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAGGGGCUUU
Model HL_37369.2  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   9 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_91939.2  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_18978.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F, sequence CUGUUCGCAG
Model HL_06226.4  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_69139.1  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUUUUAUUG
Model HL_73255.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_91503.7  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_81545.2  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_02887.3  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_99769.3  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_06059.6  matched a sequence 127 times, TP  98.04%, TN  96.01%,  51 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCCCAAG
Model HL_89199.2  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_99867.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_80599.2  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_87463.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_58224.1  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_83808.4  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_80362.1  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_01962.2  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tWH-F, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_29762.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_60266.1  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAAAAGAC
Model HL_04642.1  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_55436.1  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCCCAGAC
Model HL_80241.1  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGUUUCCA
Model HL_04641.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGACGACG
Model HL_98864.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_59330.1  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_88205.2  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F, sequence ACGUGCAAAU
Model HL_86012.1  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_18423.1  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHS-F, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_99040.1  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGCGG
Model HL_67667.2  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_85367.2  matched a sequence 151 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGGGGCGG
Model HL_51447.1  matched a sequence 155 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGUCG
Model HL_73266.9  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  13 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence GCCUUAAAC
Model HL_36335.1  matched a sequence 160 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_07951.3  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAGCGGAAG
Model HL_57863.1  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAAGGAGGUC
Model HL_45175.1  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_09452.1  matched a sequence 167 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGGCUA
Model HL_22584.6  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  26 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_85993.1  matched a sequence 173 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_53454.2  matched a sequence 177 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_80008.1  matched a sequence 177 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_34617.5  matched a sequence 179 times, TP  98.25%, TN  96.01%,  57 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_38046.1  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_83632.1  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUCCAGAU
Model HL_21372.1  matched a sequence 182 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_22622.1  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACGGUUG
Model HL_53504.3  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAGUCAUAAG
Model HL_37824.7  matched a sequence 186 times, TP  97.42%, TN  95.93%, 349 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_35677.3  matched a sequence 187 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUUUGCUA
Model HL_50860.2  matched a sequence 188 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCGGACAU
Model HL_15802.1  matched a sequence 189 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUCUGGAU
Model HL_72628.1  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_67079.1  matched a sequence 192 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_77600.2  matched a sequence 196 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAAUUCC
Model HL_28791.1  matched a sequence 198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_47854.1  matched a sequence 204 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_26934.1  matched a sequence 206 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_18565.1  matched a sequence 209 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_25967.2  matched a sequence 209 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_20743.5  matched a sequence 212 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_86883.1  matched a sequence 212 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.79%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_66853.7  matched a sequence 213 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_84299.4  matched a sequence 214 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAGUGGC
Model HL_42046.2  matched a sequence 215 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSS-F-F-F, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_47787.2  matched a sequence 215 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCCG
Model HL_61996.2  matched a sequence 219 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_89893.1  matched a sequence 219 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.80%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGAGCG
Model HL_33983.1  matched a sequence 220 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_75293.5  matched a sequence 221 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGAAAUU
Model HL_27670.2  matched a sequence 222 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  13 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F, sequence GUGACAGCC
Model HL_02817.2  matched a sequence 226 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAAAUAG
Model HL_00914.1  matched a sequence 227 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCAAAC
Model HL_93438.2  matched a sequence 229 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_89567.2  matched a sequence 230 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_15574.1  matched a sequence 232 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_81538.2  matched a sequence 234 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  16 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAACAC
Model HL_01609.3  matched a sequence 235 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  18 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence CUGGAAAG
Model HL_25061.1  matched a sequence 246 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_59735.5  matched a sequence 248 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.84%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_64690.6  matched a sequence 248 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGACGAC
Model HL_78197.1  matched a sequence 249 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUGGCC
Model HL_38808.1  matched a sequence 250 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-cWW, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_08100.1  matched a sequence 253 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCGCG
Model HL_77082.1  matched a sequence 258 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAAAG
Model HL_99748.1  matched a sequence 261 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_10540.1  matched a sequence 263 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.83%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAGG
Model HL_30680.3  matched a sequence 266 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.43%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_10453.3  matched a sequence 269 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Model HL_37344.1  matched a sequence 277 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCAUUCGG
Model HL_50318.1  matched a sequence 277 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_28075.1  matched a sequence 287 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_20167.2  matched a sequence 289 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_26631.1  matched a sequence 289 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.40%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_04259.3  matched a sequence 291 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUACAAG
Model HL_56676.1  matched a sequence 292 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.45%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_13529.1  matched a sequence 294 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAACUG
Model HL_30068.2  matched a sequence 299 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.53%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAAGCAUA
Model HL_49922.4  matched a sequence 300 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.09%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_41464.2  matched a sequence 316 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUAAAAC
Model HL_77436.5  matched a sequence 317 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  23 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAAUUG
Model HL_50537.6  matched a sequence 318 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_20811.4  matched a sequence 325 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_86769.4  matched a sequence 331 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cSH-F, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_65313.1  matched a sequence 350 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUUUG
Model HL_78347.4  matched a sequence 351 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.86%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_39243.1  matched a sequence 354 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_71391.1  matched a sequence 366 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_76094.1  matched a sequence 382 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAAUG
Model HL_87553.1  matched a sequence 389 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.81%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_93324.4  matched a sequence 394 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.51%,  24 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_87954.2  matched a sequence 425 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.35%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_31585.4  matched a sequence 430 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.04%,  20 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_20535.2  matched a sequence 449 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.69%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAAUAC
Model HL_62934.1  matched a sequence 458 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_29966.1  matched a sequence 472 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_52953.3  matched a sequence 473 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.85%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_55195.3  matched a sequence 508 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.67%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_80922.2  matched a sequence 526 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.40%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_66103.1  matched a sequence 528 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.50%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_13963.3  matched a sequence 572 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.41%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGCGAC
Model HL_97917.2  matched a sequence 585 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.79%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_65794.5  matched a sequence 588 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.49%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCA
Model HL_59843.1  matched a sequence 590 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.05%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UCAAUGA
Model HL_43517.1  matched a sequence 614 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 697 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_22135.1  matched a sequence 699 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UCCAA
Model HL_46501.1  matched a sequence 716 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.12%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS, sequence CUGAAG
Model HL_80709.3  matched a sequence 717 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.74%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_81100.2  matched a sequence 766 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.51%,   3 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_57176.2  matched a sequence 797 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GCUGAUC
Model HL_32392.1  matched a sequence 827 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_07886.3  matched a sequence 884 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.83%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_82710.2  matched a sequence 932 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_93535.1  matched a sequence 959 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.65%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCG
Model HL_94980.1  matched a sequence 992 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUUG
Model HL_86870.2  matched a sequence 1020 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUUC
Model HL_57875.1  matched a sequence 1042 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.70%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGUUUC
Model HL_27483.1  matched a sequence 1172 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence GCUUCUGC
Model HL_35941.1  matched a sequence 1183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.86%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_38901.2  matched a sequence 1220 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.36%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_38168.1  matched a sequence 1229 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.17%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CAAAG
Model HL_48778.2  matched a sequence 1277 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.10%,  46 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCGUG
Model HL_69752.2  matched a sequence 1391 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.63%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_78677.1  matched a sequence 1453 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUCG
Model HL_04783.2  matched a sequence 1467 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_50006.2  matched a sequence 1491 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_32346.4  matched a sequence 1742 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.41%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_48417.5  matched a sequence 1748 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.33%,  26 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_53890.2  matched a sequence 1962 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.39%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_13189.1  matched a sequence 1986 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.64%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUCGG
Model HL_56334.1  matched a sequence 2135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  57.50%,  16 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_75660.5  matched a sequence 2159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  61.35%,  19 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CACAG
Model HL_70782.2  matched a sequence 2339 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.65%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCUCAG
Model HL_56131.2  matched a sequence 2407 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.39%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Overall false positive rate is 1.6346%
Number of models giving false positives is 240 out of 253
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     0.41
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is     0.67
